Site pages
Current course
Participants
General
18 February - 24 February
25 February - 3 March
4 March - 10 March
11 March - 17 March
18 March - 24 March
25 March - 31 March
1 April - 7 April
8 April - 14 April
15 April - 21 April
22 April - 28 April
5.2.4. Factor substitution
a) Proliferation of aquatic weeds is a serious menace experienced by farmers growing fish in Thanjavur district. Therefore, they usually give two hand weeding employing human labour. Labour requirement per hectare is 60 human days. Application of 2.5 litre of herbicide – B followed by a hand weeding which requires 25 womendays per hectare could also be done. Wage rate / work day =Rs 15/-. The cost of application of herbicide/ha works out to Rs.30/-. Price of herbicide Rs 106/litre. There is no yield difference between these two practices. Suggest the most economic method of weed control to the fish farmer For hand weeding = Rs 900 (60 women labourers @ Rs 15) Herbicide application Cost of herbicide = 265 Cost of application = 30 Cost of hired labour = 375 Total = 670 Reduced cost =Rs 230.00 Format Gain Rs Losses Rs Added gain - added cost - Reduced cost 230.00 reduced return - The net gain obtained is Rs 230.00 by introducing herbicide. Hence, we can introduce the change. b) If the yield of fish increases by 2 % due to the introduction of weed control by herbicide application suggest whether this technique could be adopted or not. The yield obtained earlier was 5 t/ha. Price / kg = Rs 3. Additional yield realized =
Gross income realized with hand weeding = 5,000 x 3 = Rs 15,000 Additional income obtained with herbicide application = 15,300 (5,100 x3) = 15,300 – 15,000 = 300
Gain Rs Losses Rs Added gain 300 added cost - Reducedcost 230 reduced return -
Net gain = Rs 530 Since a net gain of Rs 530 is possible with herbicide application, it is recommended for adoption by fish farmers. |