Site pages
Current course
Participants
General
Module 1. History and types of greenhouse
Module 2.Function and features of greenhouse
Module 3.Scope and development of greenhouse techn...
Module 4.Location, planning and various components...
Module 5.Design criteria and calculations
Module 6. Construction materials and methods of co...
Module 7. Covering material and characteristics
Module 8. Solar heat transfer
Module 9. Solar fraction for greenhouse
Module 10. Steady state analysis of greenhouse
Module No. 11 Greenhouse Heating, Cooling, Sheddin...
Module 12. Carbon dioxide generation and monitorin...
Module 13. Instrumentation and & computerized ...
Module 14. Watering, fertilization, root substrate...
Module 15. Containers and benches
Module 16. Plant nutrition, Alternative cropping s...
Module 17. Plant tissue culture
Module 18. Chemical growth regulation
Module 19. Disease control, integrated pest manage...
Module 20: Post Production Quality and Handling
Module 21: Cost analysis of greenhouse Production
Module 22. Application of greenhouse & its rep...
Lesson 30 Post -Harvest Quality of Greenhouse Produce
30.1 INTRODUCTION
The quality is the set of properties and characteristics of a product, process or service that grant its aptitude to satisfy established or implicit needs. The notion of a food product’s quality is, simultaneously, complex and relative; it is complex because the quality of a product cannot be determined by a single property, but from the combination of all its physical, chemical and sensorial properties; and it is relative because this combination of factors that define it must be such that determines acceptance by the consumer. Fresh vegetable products maintain, after their harvest, a metabolic activity that is essential for the preservation of their quality.
30.2 QUALITY ATTRIBUTES
The quality is a combination of attributes, properties or characteristics that provide the product value, depending on the destined use.
The appearance, the texture, the firmness, the organoleptic characteristics and the nutritional value are components of the quality.
The relative importance of each component of the quality depends on the product and how it is consumed, varying among growers, distributors and consumers.
For the grower, a product must provide high yields and have a good appearance, be easy to grow and have a good resistance to transportation, whereas for the wholesaler the qualitative attributes of appearance, firmness and shelf life prevail.
In addition, the consumer values the healthiness and the nutritional value. In general, consumers place a high value on fresh fruits and vegetables as a healthy and natural food.
Many of the qualitative attributes of fresh horticultural products are subjective, which makes their evaluation even more complex.
The consumer usually judges the quality of a product by its external appearance and, if there is no other information (different production methods, differentiating labels), will deduce that a product with a good appearance will have a good internal quality.
The colour, the size, the uniformity and the absence of defects are basic aspects of the appearance, together with a good presentation, in proper packages that contain a standardized product.
The food safety and hygiene in the production process demanded by the consumer have made necessary the establishment of rigorous production protocols (which specify growing methods, traceability, etc.) that guarantee the healthiness of the products.
Transport over long distances in some cases means that some vegetables are harvested before the commercial ripening point; so that when they reach the consumer they are in a suboptimal organoleptic condition.
The greenhouse growing conditions (light, temperature, irrigation, nutrition, salinity) affect the quality (Welles, 1999), so their management must be optimized.
The qualitative attributes of vegetables vary with the species. In some products such as cucumber, whose shelf life is the main quality attribute, a qualitative evaluation is simple, whereas for others such as tomato, it is more complicated, especially regarding its organoleptic characteristics.
In some cases, such as tomato, achieving a high quality may involve a decrease in the yield, so a compromise between quality and quantity in the production must be reached.
The sensorial quality is dictated by a number of external and internal factors. The external factors include the attributes related to the appearance, such as colour, form, size and firmness, and are subject to physical and visual properties, being appreciated by the consumer through the senses of sight and touch, whereas the attributes related to flavour, aroma and texture, which are sensed by the taste and smell, are included among the internal factors of sensorial quality (Martínez-Madrid et al., 2000).
The essential criteria to evaluate the sensorial quality in fruits and vegetables are the colour, flavour, aroma and texture. The flavour and the aroma are the most subjective and difficult to evaluate qualitative aspects.
The flavour can be evaluated by taste and smell, and is mainly composed of sweetness, acidity and aroma, that correspond to the sugars, acids and volatiles, respectively (Baldwin, 2003). Other components of the flavour are bitterness, salinity and astringency.
The acidity and the aroma modify the perception of sweetness, one of the most important components of the flavour in fruits and vegetables. The perception of the non-volatile components of flavour (sweet, acid, salty and bitter) takes place on the tongue and the aromas are detected by the nose; both perceptions are integrated in the brain, being difficult to distinguish between them (Baldwin, 2003).
The genetic characteristics are the main determinants of flavour and aroma of fresh horticultural products, although they are influenced, but to a lesser degree, by cultural practices and the pre-harvest conditions, as well as by the ripening stage at harvest and any subsequent handling.
The organoleptic quality of non-climacteric fruits generally decreases after harvest, whereas climacteric fruits may reach their best quality after being harvested, if they are harvested after the beginning of the ripening process.
The sensorial evaluation of flavour and aroma of a product is usually done by taster panels. Consumer preferences vary depending on socio-economic, ethnic and geographical conditions.
The sugars that supply the sweet flavour are fructose (the sweetest), sucrose and glucose (the least sweet). Organic acids, such as citric acid in tomato, provide the acid taste.
In the majority of melon cultivars the main sugar is sucrose and the most common acids are citric and malic acids, whereas in watermelon sucrose predominates and, in some cultivars, there are high levels of fructose, and malic acid is the only relevant acid (Baldwin, 2003).
In tomato, the total content of soluble solids and the acidity determine its taste. The most abundant sugars are glucose and fructose, at approximately equal levels, with citric acid being present in greater quantities than malic acid. There is also the presence of a large number of volatile compounds (more than 400) from which 16 contribute more effectively to the taste and aroma (Baldwin, 2003).
The texture is a qualitative attribute that is critical for the acceptance of fruits and vegetables, that is, for the perception that the consumer has of the qualitative characteristics. The texture involves the structural and mechanical properties of an edible product and its sensorial perception in the hand or in the mouth (Abbot and Harker, 2003).
The texture is related to a series of chemical compounds responsible for the perception of the structure, such as pectin, cellulose, hemi-celluloses and proteins (Martínez-Madrid et al., 2000).
Sometimes, the term texture includes some mechanical properties, which cannot be of interest to the consumer, such as resistance to mechanical damage or transport. The texture is altered throughout the shelf life of the product, so it can only be referred to at the time of evaluation.
Measurements of texture, nowadays, are considered critical indicators of the non-visual aspects of quality. The complexity of the texture allows for its complete measurement only by means of sensorial evaluation (valuation panels), although instrumental measurements are preferable, whenever possible. There are many measurements that relate to textural attributes, normally the more precise ones being those that use destructive methods (Abbot and Harker, 2003).
Obtaining a high quality product depends on the expression of the genetic characteristics of the chosen cultivar under the ecological conditions in which it is cultivated.
The study of the nutritional value and the beneficial effects of fruits and vegetables on human health has become increasingly relevant in recent years (Desjardins and Patil, 2007; Patil et al., 2009).
The control of the pre-harvest conditions, of an environmental nature (temperature, humidity, radiation, soil, rain) and cultural nature (nutrition, irrigation, pruning), is not enough to achieve a good quality product, as the ripening stage of the fruits at the time of harvesting is the factor that plays an essential role in the sensorial qualitative characteristics. This is because the production of compounds such as the aromas that contribute to the flavour take place, mainly, in the advanced stages of the ripening process (Martínez- Madrid et al., 2000).
An early harvest has advantages for distribution of the product, as the texture is maintained for a longer period extending the shelf life, but this is to the detriment of its sensorial quality, at least in non- climacteric fruits.
It is evident that the future relies on the quality, but is must be economically feasible quality. The fixing of integral quality systems is a clear priority in the production of greenhouse vegetables.
30.3 QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE
Quality control (QC) is the process of maintaining an acceptable quality level to the consumer. Quality assurance (QA) is the system whose purpose is to assure that the overall QC job is being done effectively (Hubbard, 1999). QA and QC are often used interchangeably to cover the planning, development, and implementation of inspection and testing techniques; they take time and a lot of training. A successful QA/QC system cannot be flexible, but it must be subject to constant review and improvement as conditions change (Hubbard, 1999).
Many attempts are currently being made to automate the separation of a given commodity into various grades and the elimination of defective units. The availability of low-cost microcomputers and solid-state imaging systems has made computer-aided video inspection on the packing line a practical reality. Solid-state video camera or light reflectance systems are used for detection of external defects, and x-ray or light transmittance systems are used for detecting internal defects (Abbott et al, 1997; NRAES,1997). Further development of these and other systems to provide greater reliability and efficiency will be very helpful in quality control efforts.
An effective quality control and assurance system throughout the handling steps between harvest and retail display (Table 30.1) is required to provide a consistently good- quality supply of fresh horticultural crops to the consumers and to protect the reputation of a given marketing label. Quality control starts in the field with the selection of the proper time to harvest for maximum quality. Careful harvesting is essential to minimize physical injuries and maintain quality. Each subsequent step after harvest has the potential to either maintain or reduce quality; few postharvest procedures can improve the quality of individual units of the commodity (Cavalieri, 1999; Kader, 1988; Kader, 1992; Shewfelt et al., 1993).
Exposure of a commodity to temperatures, relative humidity, and/or concentrations of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene outside its optimum ranges will accelerate loss of all quality attributes. The loss of flavor and nutritional quality of fresh intact or cut fruits and vegetables occurs at a faster rate than the loss of textural and appearance quality. Thus, QC/QA programs should be based on all quality attributes and not only on appearance factors as often is the case. More research is needed to identify the reasons for the faster loss of flavor than appearance quality and to develop new strategies for extending postharvest-life based on flavor to match that based on appearance.
Table 30.1 Quality assurance procedures during handling of horticultural perishables.
Handling steps |
Quality Assurance Procedure |
Harvesting |
Training workers on proper maturity and quality selection, careful handling, and protecting produce from sun exposure. |
Packing house operations |
Checking product maturity, quality, and temperature upon arrival. Implementing an effective sanitation program to reduce microbial load. Checking packaging materials and shipping containers to ensure they meet specifications. Training workers on proper grading by quality (defects, colour, and size), packing, and other packinghouse operations. Inspecting a random sample of the packed product to ensure that it meets grade specification. Monitoring product temperature to assure completion of the cooling process. Maintaining effective communications with quality inspectors and receivers to correct any deficiencies as soon as they are identified. |
Transportation |
Inspecting all transport vehicles before loading for functionality and cleanliness. Training workers on proper loading and placement of temperature-recording devices in each load. Keeping records of all shipments as part of the “trace- back” system |
Handling at destination |
Checking product quality upon receipt and moving it quickly to the appropriate storage area. Shipping product from distribution center to retail markets without delay and on a first in/first out basis unless its condition necessitates a different order. |
30.4 STANDARDIZATION AND INSPECTION OF FRESH PRODUCE
Grade standards identify the degrees of quality in a commodity that are the basis of its usability and value. Such standards, if enforced properly, are essential tools of quality assurance during marketing and provide a common language for trade among growers, handlers, processors, and receivers at terminal markets. Some production areas like California, USA enforce minimum standards concerning produce quality, maturity, container, marking, size and packing requirements. This provides orderly marketing and equity in the marketplace and protects consumers from inedible and poor quality produce.
Inspection is done either on a continuous basis (where one or more inspectors are assigned to a packing house to make frequent quality checks of the commodity along the packing lines), or on a sample basis (where representative samples of a prescribed number of boxes out of a given lot are randomly selected and inspected to determine whether the product meets the grade specification for which it is packed). When inspection is completed, certificates are issued by the inspector on the basis of applicable official standards.
To ensure uniformity of inspection: 1) inspectors are trained to apply the standards, (2) visual aids (color charts, models, diagrams, photographs and the like) are used whenever possible, (3) objective methods for determining quality and maturity are used whenever feasible and practical, and (4) good working environments with proper lighting are provided.
International standards for fruits and vegetables were introduced by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development beginning in 1961, and now there are standards for about 40 commodities. Each includes three quality classes with appropriate tolerances: Extra class = superior quality (equivalent to “U.S. Fancy”); Class I = good quality (equivalent to “U.S. No. 1”); and Class II = marketable quality (equivalent to “U.S. No. 2”). Class I covers the bulk of produce entering into international trade. These standards or their equivalents are mandatory in the European Union countries for imported and exported fruits and vegetables.
REFERENCES
1. A.A.Kader, 2001. “Quality assurance of harvested horticultural perishables” Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Postharvest. 553, ISHS.
2. Nicolas Castilla, 2013. “Greenhouse Technology and Management.” Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid (Spain) and Mexico.PP. 245-246