Site pages
Current course
Participants
General
18 February - 24 February
25 February - 3 March
4 March - 10 March
11 March - 17 March
18 March - 24 March
25 March - 31 March
1 April - 7 April
8 April - 14 April
15 April - 21 April
22 April - 28 April
7.1.4 Chromosome mapping
In 1913, Sturtevant,constructed first chromosome map showing the position of 5 genes on the X chromosome of Drosophila.
Gene Mapping The development of somatic cell hybridization methods provided a major impetus for determining linkage relationships of loci phenotypically expressed by somatic cells in culture.
Development of gene mapping methods and their application to fish species
The vast majority of mapped genes can be assigned to one of four classes: Genes producing inherited diseases or defects. Genes producing “mutant” phenotypes, though not necessarily affecting viability. Genes producing distinctive colour patterns, and Biochemical loci, coding for enzyme and other proteins. In the first three classes, establishment of homology between species is usually difficult. Even within a single genus of fishes, Xiphophorus (platy fishes and sword tails of the family Poecilidae), very similar patterns of lateral black spots comprised of macromelanophore cells are coded by quite different, almost certainly non-homologous genes. In poecilid fishes a few species characterized by unusual diversity of pigment pattern polymorphisms received early genetic study resulting in considerable linkage data.
Methods available for assigning genes to chromosomes or linkage groups
2. Somatic cell hybrids 3. In situ hybridization method
Genetic maps of protein coding loci in fishes Only few families of fishes have been utilized for genetic mapping studies: Salmonidae (trouts and salmon), Centrarchidae (freshwater sunfishes), and Poecilidae (platyfishes and swordtails, Xiphophorus sp. and Poecilia reticulata, the guppy). The vast majority of linkage data in Xiphophorus are derived from backcrosses produced using an interspecific F1 hybrid, Xiphophorus helleri x X. maculatus. Additionally, some intraspecific matings between various populations of X. maculatus, X. helleri have been produced and yield linkage data for a substantial number of locus pairs. Gene mapping studies in fishes have yielded respectable bodies of data only in systems utilizing interspecific hybrids-Xiphophorus, Poecilopsis, Lepomis, Salmo, Salvelinus and Oncorhynchus. The breeding of hybrids has been extremely important both in aquarium trade and in commercial fisheries research and development. Thus, it appears that the major reason for the paucity of linkage data in fishes is not the lack of producible hybrids, but rather the lack of use of such hybrids for genetic analysis, particularly with respect to mapping of enzyme loci. 1. Physical maps These are based on the assignment of loci to chromosomes and can be accomplished mainly by the methods such as somatic cell hybrid panels, in situ hybridization and comparative mapping. In physical maps the coordinates are the chromosome regions or bands, and the distance between two loci are measured in kilobases. 2. Genetic maps These are constructed by studying the meiotic recombination between two or more loci through linkage analysis. In a linkage analysis, a new locus are assigned to a chromosome following the inheritance of the new locus and of an already mapped locus. Such maps do not provide an absolute location of loci but they reveal the genetic distance of the loci as a function of the frequency of crossing overs occurring during recombination. This is the second major gene mapping method, which has produced a quantum expansion in gene map assignments. The power of this method lies in the use of cells from distantly related species. The disadvantage of somatic cell method is that, in the absence of detected deletions, insertions, or translocations, no information is obtained concerning the positions of loci relative to each other on the chromosome. |